Carolina Bohrer Martins vs Hong Yi Cody Wong Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Martins vs Wong analysis and find out who is favored!
Carolina Bohrer Martins vs Hong Yi Cody Wong Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Martins 0 - 0 Wong
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Martins has won 36.06% of points on their second serve, while Wong has won 46.25%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Martins, in recent form, has won 50.37% of their opponent's second serve points, while Wong has won 53.77%. The same stats for first serve returns are 36.76% and 41.66% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Martins has saved 54.01% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Wong has saved 53.36% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Martins has won 21.43% of matches played (W/L 6/ 22), with Wong winning 53.49% (W/L 23/ 20) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Martins has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 50% (W/L 1/ 1), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 24% (W/L 7/ 22). Wong has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 62% (W/L 118/ 71), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 30% (W/L 3/ 7).
- Player level: In the last year, Martins has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 21.74% of matches (W/L 5/ 18), where as Wong has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 51.72% of matches (W/L 15/ 14). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Martins has played against opponents with an average rank of 296.86 while Wong has played against players with an average rank of 239.81.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Martins has won 25% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Wong has won 50% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Martins has converted 49.33% of breakpoint opportunities, and Wong has converted 47.52% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
- If you are interested in models that predict tennis matches, this article is a good start (Warning: Stats geeks only)
0
Total
0
Mast
0
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
0
Minor
895
Rank
862
High
16
Age
Plays
0
Total0
0
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
541
Rank
319
High
22
Age
Plays
3
Total
0
Mast
1
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
2
Minor
Form
29% (15-37)
Career Total W/L
60% (122-80)
14% (2-12)
YTD W/L
58% (19-14)
$0
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
The Best Odds For Carolina Bohrer Martins vs Hong Yi Cody Wong For Any Market:
We highly recommend you open accounts with at least 3 Bookmakers as depending on the match, odds can vary a lot between them, and always getting the best odds available will improve your profitability a lot in the long run. We recommend these Sportsbooks for you so sign up now! Check the current best odds by clicking the Sportsbook links below:
Sportsbooks & Bookies Promo Codes For Martins VS Wong
No H2H Matches Available
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
stats | Carolina Bohrer Martins | Hong Yi Cody Wong |
---|---|---|
YTD W/L | 14% (2/12) | 58% (19/14) |
Sets Win/Loss | 22% (7/25) | 59% (44/30) |
Games Win/Loss | 39% (119/185) | 52% (349/320) |
Hard Win/Loss | 25% (1/3) | 58% (19/14) |
Clay Win/Loss | 10% (1/9) | 0% (0/0) |
Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Aces pg | 0.07 | 0.16 |
Aces Total | 11 | 54 |
DFs per game | 0.71 | 0.29 |
DFs Total | 105 | 96 |
Avg Match Time | 1:27:34 | 1:47:23 |
Avg Opp Rank | 174.5 | 199.24 |
1st Serve % | 56% (449/804) | 61% (1294/2133) |
1st Serve W% | 56% (251/449) | 62% (805/1294) |
2nd Serve W% | 36% (128/355) | 46% (388/839) |
BPs Won% Total | 49% (37/75) | 48% (134/282) |
Return Pts W% | 42% (315/757) | 46% (1026/2212) |
Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Challenger W/L | 10% (1/9) | 55% (11/9) |
Futures W/L | 25% (1/3) | 62% (8/5) |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 14% (2/14) | 63% (19/30) |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
TBs Win% (Total) | 25% (1/4) | 80% (4/5) |
Deciding Set W% | 25% (1/4) | 45% (5/11) |
1st set W, W | 50% (4/2) | 71% (21/15) |
1st set W, L | 50% (4/2) | 29% (21/6) |
1st set L, W | 0% (10/0) | 33% (12/4) |
Carolina Bohrer Martins Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Q1 |
Kylie Mckenzie
Player
Carolina Bohrer Martins
54%
(
20 of
37)
1st Serve %
55%
(
32 of
58)
-
Aces
-
1
Double Faults
5
85%
(
17 of
20)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
17 of
32)
65%
(
11 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
27%
(
7 of
26)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
24%
(
9 of
37)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
34 of
58)
62
Total Points Won
33
|
6-0 6-3 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Jessica Hinojosa Gomez
Player
Carolina Bohrer Martins
70%
(
61 of
87)
1st Serve %
59%
(
48 of
82)
0
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
7
56%
(
34 of
61)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
24 of
48)
54%
(
14 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
12 of
34)
47%
(
8 of
17)
Break Points Won
56%
(
5 of
9)
45%
(
39 of
87)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
46 of
82)
94
Total Points Won
75
|
4-6 6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Clara Vlasselaer
Player
Carolina Bohrer Martins
45%
(
24 of
53)
1st Serve %
58%
(
30 of
52)
0
Aces
1
8
Double Faults
6
88%
(
21 of
24)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
18 of
30)
59%
(
17 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
8 of
22)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
28%
(
15 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
26 of
52)
64
Total Points Won
41
|
6-3 6-0 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Carolina Bohrer Martins
Player
Ana Carmen Zamburek
60%
(
68 of
114)
1st Serve %
63%
(
57 of
90)
1
Aces
1
10
Double Faults
9
59%
(
40 of
68)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
34 of
57)
46%
(
21 of
46)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
11 of
33)
46%
(
6 of
13)
Break Points Won
32%
(
6 of
19)
46%
(
53 of
114)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
45 of
90)
106
Total Points Won
98
|
6-4 2-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Kayla Cross
Player
Carolina Bohrer Martins
55%
(
41 of
74)
1st Serve %
59%
(
40 of
68)
1
Aces
0
9
Double Faults
8
71%
(
29 of
41)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
23 of
40)
39%
(
13 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
9 of
28)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
40%
(
4 of
10)
43%
(
32 of
74)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
36 of
68)
78
Total Points Won
64
|
7-6(4) 6-1 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Kajsa Rinaldo Persson
Player
Carolina Bohrer Martins
60%
(
25 of
42)
1st Serve %
61%
(
30 of
49)
-
Aces
-
2
Double Faults
10
80%
(
20 of
25)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
15 of
30)
59%
(
10 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
6 of
19)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
29%
(
12 of
42)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
28 of
49)
58
Total Points Won
33
|
6-4 6-0 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Martina Okalova
Player
Carolina Bohrer Martins
70%
(
45 of
64)
1st Serve %
63%
(
50 of
80)
0
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
9
60%
(
27 of
45)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
31 of
50)
68%
(
13 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
11 of
30)
29%
(
4 of
14)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
38%
(
24 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
38 of
80)
78
Total Points Won
66
|
7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Valeriya Strakhova
Player
Carolina Bohrer Martins
78%
(
92 of
118)
1st Serve %
52%
(
50 of
97)
0
Aces
3
4
Double Faults
17
59%
(
54 of
92)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
30 of
50)
46%
(
12 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
15 of
47)
50%
(
8 of
16)
Break Points Won
55%
(
6 of
11)
44%
(
52 of
118)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
52 of
97)
118
Total Points Won
97
|
6-7(5) 6-1 7-6(2) | H2H | ||
QF |
Juliana Rodriguez
Player
Carolina Bohrer Martins
67%
(
48 of
72)
1st Serve %
53%
(
47 of
89)
1
Aces
0
6
Double Faults
9
63%
(
30 of
48)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
30 of
47)
33%
(
8 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
18 of
42)
30%
(
3 of
10)
Break Points Won
63%
(
5 of
8)
47%
(
34 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
41 of
89)
79
Total Points Won
82
|
7-6(3) 3-6 10-6 | H2H | ||
Q1 | 6-2 6-3 | H2H |
view more
Hong Yi Cody Wong Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
QF |
Alyssa Ahn
Player
Hong Yi Cody Wong
63%
(
67 of
106)
1st Serve %
53%
(
49 of
92)
-
Aces
-
1
Double Faults
8
57%
(
38 of
67)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
25 of
49)
46%
(
18 of
39)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
17 of
43)
44%
(
7 of
16)
Break Points Won
26%
(
5 of
19)
47%
(
50 of
106)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
50 of
92)
106
Total Points Won
92
|
3-6 6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Hong Yi Cody Wong
Player
Chloe Noel
61%
(
53 of
87)
1st Serve %
61%
(
42 of
69)
5
Aces
3
5
Double Faults
4
64%
(
34 of
53)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
24 of
42)
47%
(
16 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
15 of
27)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
43%
(
37 of
87)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
30 of
69)
80
Total Points Won
76
|
6-3 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
R1 |
Hong Yi Cody Wong
Player
Teja Tirunelveli
62%
(
53 of
85)
1st Serve %
47%
(
41 of
88)
5
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
9
62%
(
33 of
53)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
23 of
41)
50%
(
16 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
21 of
47)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
42%
(
36 of
85)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
44 of
88)
93
Total Points Won
80
|
6-3 7-6(7) | H2H | ||
R3 |
Clara Vlasselaer
Player
Hong Yi Cody Wong
59%
(
51 of
86)
1st Serve %
57%
(
47 of
83)
4
Aces
5
3
Double Faults
3
69%
(
35 of
51)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
32 of
47)
49%
(
17 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
18 of
36)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
57%
(
4 of
7)
40%
(
34 of
86)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
33 of
83)
85
Total Points Won
84
|
2-6 6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Hong Yi Cody Wong
Player
Yuliana Monroy
76%
(
31 of
41)
1st Serve %
82%
(
42 of
51)
-
Aces
-
3
Double Faults
1
61%
(
19 of
31)
1st Serve Won
36%
(
15 of
42)
40%
(
4 of
10)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
70%
(
7 of
10)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
44%
(
18 of
41)
Rtn Points Won
65%
(
33 of
51)
56
Total Points Won
36
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Hong Yi Cody Wong
Player
Gabriella Vannessa Lindgren
48%
(
26 of
54)
1st Serve %
67%
(
52 of
78)
1
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
3
65%
(
17 of
26)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
30 of
52)
39%
(
11 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
11 of
26)
23%
(
3 of
13)
Break Points Won
71%
(
5 of
7)
48%
(
26 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
37 of
78)
65
Total Points Won
67
|
0-6 6-4 10-8 | H2H | ||
R3 |
Elysia Bolton
Player
Hong Yi Cody Wong
61%
(
40 of
66)
1st Serve %
47%
(
35 of
74)
3
Aces
4
5
Double Faults
5
60%
(
24 of
40)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
18 of
35)
46%
(
12 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
18 of
39)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
45%
(
30 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
38 of
74)
74
Total Points Won
66
|
7-6(5) 6-1 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Ayano Shimizu
Player
Hong Yi Cody Wong
70%
(
49 of
70)
1st Serve %
63%
(
52 of
82)
0
Aces
5
2
Double Faults
3
63%
(
31 of
49)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
30 of
52)
48%
(
10 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
10 of
30)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
41%
(
29 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
42 of
82)
83
Total Points Won
69
|
2-6 6-0 6-2 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Yidi Yang
Player
Hong Yi Cody Wong
73%
(
29 of
40)
1st Serve %
63%
(
19 of
30)
-
Aces
-
2
Double Faults
1
55%
(
16 of
29)
1st Serve Won
42%
(
8 of
19)
55%
(
6 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
5 of
11)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
13%
(
1 of
8)
45%
(
18 of
40)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
17 of
30)
39
Total Points Won
31
|
6-2 ret. | H2H | ||
QF |
Lanlana Tararudee
Player
Hong Yi Cody Wong
55%
(
26 of
47)
1st Serve %
67%
(
36 of
54)
2
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
1
65%
(
17 of
26)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
18 of
36)
57%
(
12 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
7 of
18)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
38%
(
18 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
29 of
54)
58
Total Points Won
43
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H |
view more
Martins Vs Wong Prediction H2H Images To Share
More tennis photos of Martins are available here and Wong photos here.